Has compromised small office and home office (SOHO) network edge devices, many of which were located in the same geographic area as the victim, to proxy network traffic.12
Network Devices T1584.008
- Tactic
- Resource Development
- Platform
- PRE
- Version
- 1.1
- Created
- 28 March 2024
- Last modified
- 12 May 2026
- Contributor
- Gavin Knapp
Adversaries may compromise third-party network devices that can be used during targeting. Network devices, such as small office/home office (SOHO) routers, may be compromised where the adversary's ultimate goal is not Initial Access to that environment, but rather to leverage these devices to support additional targeting.
Network Devices MITRE reference T1584.008
4 groups have been recorded using this technique. Newest first; each entry carries MITRE’s procedure text and a link to the group’s full record. Click a name to filter the rules below.
Has compromised network devices such as small office and home office (SOHO) routers and IoT devices for ORB (operational relay box) Proxy networks.12
Has used compromised networking devices, such as small office/home office (SOHO) devices, as operational command and control infrastructure.1
Compromised Ubiquiti network devices to act as collection devices for credentials compromised via phishing webpages.1
All 4 groups for this technique
6 campaigns have been recorded using this technique. Listed newest first; dates are year-granularity and attribution is MITRE’s.
During the 2025 Poland Wiper Attacks, the adversaries used compromised Cisco routers for network communications.1
Used compromised small office/home office (SOHO) devices to interact with vulnerable Versa Director servers.1
During Cutting Edge, threat actors used compromised and out-of-support Cyberoam VPN appliances for C2.12
Has compromised network devices, such as IP cameras, Network Attached Storage (NAS) devices, and SOHO routers, to leverage for follow-on activity.12
Focuses on compromise of small office-home office (SOHO) network devices to build the subsequent botnet.1
Has compromised network routers and IoT devices for the ORB network.1
All 6 campaigns for this technique
Offense vs defense T1584.008
Is defensive coverage keeping up with adversary use? Eight counts, each ranked against all 697 ATT&CK techniques. Attack sits left, defense right, so a shape leaning left means adversaries are better documented here than defenders are equipped. Hover any spoke for its percentile and the share of techniques that have more. The timeline below shows when each side arrived.
Network Devices detection strategy DET0859
MITRE names one behaviour worth catching for this technique and breaks it into 1 analytic, one per platform. Each carries the log sources it needs and the fields you tune per environment.
Detection of Network Devices
AN1991 · PRE
Once adversaries leverage compromised network devices as infrastructure (ex: for command and control), it may be possible to look for unique characteristics associated with adversary software, if known. Much of this activity will take place outside the visibility of the target organization, making detection of this behavior difficult. Detection efforts may be focused on related stages of the adversary lifecycle.
Log sources
The data this analytic draws on. You do not need every component — each one you already collect covers part of it. Each links to its ATT&CK record.
| Data component | Name | Channel |
|---|---|---|
| Response ContentDC0104 | Internet Scan | None |
This technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on behaviors performed outside of the scope of enterprise defenses and controls.